Passenger Injury Claims After a Car Accident in Waterbury, CT
We Only Get Paid If You Do
As an injured passenger, you have no control over a vehicle’s speed or following distance, yet you face medical bills after a crash. Connecticut law allows an injured passenger to file a claim against the driver of the vehicle you occupied, the driver of another vehicle, or both. Collisions on the downtown grid maintained by the City of Waterbury and at the I-84 and Route 8 interchange can involve two vehicles whose drivers blame each other, while an injured passenger may have no role in causing the collision.
Attorney Dan Petroskey leads DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C., continuing a 60-year history of representing Waterbury crash victims. He manages your passenger injury claim from the initial investigation through trial, identifying every at-fault driver and uncovering all available insurance policies before settlement discussions begin. Over 100,000 motor vehicle collisions occur in Connecticut each year. A large share of those crashes involve passengers who may need strong legal representation to recover their medical costs and lost wages.
This page explains when you can sue the driver of your vehicle and how claims work when multiple drivers share fault. It covers claims involving family members, household auto policies, uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, and comparative fault. To speak with a car accident attorney in Waterbury, call DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. at (203) 756-7408 to schedule a free consultation.
Dan Petroskey and I have known each other professionally for many years, Dan truly cares about his clients best interests. I would highly recommend DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. Its refreshing to know they will work hard and diligent to achieve favorable…
I highly recommend Daniel Petroskey as an outstanding lawyer. He picked up an old case of mine and worked tirelessly to get me the best possible results. His expertise, dedication, and attention to detail…
Milly keeps me informed about my case and is consistently effective. She answers all my calls and responds to my inquires in a timely manner. I feel confident that I made the appropriate choice with this firm…
Can a Passenger Sue the Driver After a Crash?
Yes, a passenger can sue the driver of the vehicle they were riding in if that driver’s negligence contributed to the crash, and the claim can involve that driver’s bodily injury liability coverage, just as a claim against another negligent driver can.
A passenger claim differs from a driver-versus-driver claim in one respect. The passenger often bears no responsibility for causing the crash. If more than one driver contributed to the crash, the passenger can assert claims against both, and a court or jury can apportion negligence under Connecticut Section 52-572h.
Insurers for both vehicles may expect the passenger to recover from one or more liable parties, but liability can still be disputed, so negotiations can address fault, injury value, and policy limits. Identifying every available policy before negotiations begin is the most important step in a passenger claim.
You’ll never be left in the dark. We keep clients informed every step of the way.
Excellent service and care! They have done right by me before and I will continue to use them as my law office of choice if further incidents were to arise. Dan Petroskey is/was especially kind and thorough with his process. Their level of …
FYI to anyone looking for a great firm and attorneys that understand , believe and fight for their clients best interest. My apologies for the long review but it’s necessary to articulate the facts and blessings of finding this firm and the great attorneys and staff…
Eugene Defronzo And Dan Petroskey Really represent their Clients to the fullest, very professional, and educated lawyers with lots experience and passion for their trade. Ivelisse and Milly were also great to speak with and Make you feel …
When you call, you speak directly with your attorney, not just a voicemail or assistant.
What If More Than One Driver Caused the Accident?
When two or more drivers contributed to the crash, a passenger can pursue a claim against each, naming both as defendants in the same lawsuit. A single Connecticut liability policy at the statutory minimum may not cover surgery, rehabilitation, and lost income. A second at-fault driver’s policy can increase the amount of insurance available to compensate the passenger.
Comparative Fault Under Connecticut General Statutes Section 52-572h
Connecticut apportions responsibility among liable parties under Connecticut General Statutes Section 52-572h. For example, if a host driver is found 70 percent responsible and an oncoming driver is 30 percent responsible, each is financially liable for their respective share of the damages.
If the statutory requirements are met, the court can reallocate uncollectible economic and noneconomic damages among the remaining defendants. Economic damages are reallocated under Section 52-572h, while noneconomic reallocation is subject to an additional statutory cap.
Recovering From Multiple Insurance Policies
A passenger can present claims to each at-fault driver’s insurer at the same time. Settling with one driver does not automatically end the claim against another, but release language must be drafted to avoid extinguishing rights against parties you never intended to release.
If all applicable bodily injury liability limits are exhausted and the applicable UIM limit is higher than the total applicable liability limits, UIM coverage may provide additional benefits, subject to the policy and the passenger’s damages. Waterbury personal injury attorney Dan Petroskey can explain your options and determine whether this strategy fits your claim. Call DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. at (203) 756-7408 to schedule a free consultation.
Key Takeaway: When two or more drivers share fault, Connecticut General Statutes Section 52-572h allows a passenger to recover from each at-fault driver in proportion to that driver’s assigned percentage of responsibility.
Ivelisse Cruz, the office manager/legal assistant of the firm, is one of the hardest workers I know! She is focused and determined to help her clients! She goes above and beyond for her clients’ needs. Her love of the law and justice gets …
I usually don’t write reviews, but I had to for the Great experience I received with Law Office of Eugene DeFronzo, they work with you every bit of the way Dan was great. He always called to check up on me and make sure everything was good. …
As My first time having a motor vehicle accident and seeking compensation for my loss, I highly recommend the offices of Eugene Defronzo. They were very attentive to my case and never hesitated to answer any questions I had. Staff members are Very…
Does Connecticut Law Limit Claims Against a Family Member Driver?
Connecticut permits a passenger to bring a negligence claim against a family member who was driving, including a parent, child, spouse, or other household member. Connecticut General Statutes Section 52-572c abrogates the immunity that once existed between parent and child in negligence actions arising from the operation of a motor vehicle, while Section 46b-36 generally allows one spouse to sue the other for torts.
Many passengers hesitate to sue someone they love, but the negligence claim is against the driver, while liability insurance can pay covered damages up to the policy limits. The driver can have personal exposure for damages above those limits or for amounts the policy does not cover.
The amount of coverage available depends on the policy language, which is where household exclusion clauses become important.
How Do Household Auto Policies Affect Your Claim?
When the passenger and driver live in the same household, the coverage analysis changes, though the right to file a claim does not. A resident relative may qualify as an insured under the policy, depending on the policy’s definitions, exclusions, and endorsements.
Household Exclusion Clauses
A household exclusion, sometimes called a resident relative exclusion, is policy language that seeks to limit liability coverage for certain relatives who live with the named insured. Under Connecticut General Statutes Section 38a-335, liability coverage applies to resident relatives unless a relative is specifically excluded by endorsement, so both the statute and the policy language matter.
Such an exclusion does not necessarily eliminate every possible source of recovery. Coverage from another at-fault driver or other applicable first-party coverage may remain, depending on the policies and Connecticut law.
Multiple UM/UIM Policies
Connecticut law prohibits adding UM/UIM limits for two or more vehicles to create a higher limit for one accident. If an insured passenger occupies a nonowned vehicle, the occupied vehicle’s UM/UIM coverage is primary, coverage under a policy on which the passenger is a named insured is secondary, and other applicable policies are excess. The total recoverable UM/UIM coverage is limited as Section 38a-336 provides.
Key Takeaway: A household exclusion can limit liability coverage, but other coverage may still apply. Connecticut law does not allow UM/UIM limits on multiple vehicles to be added together for one accident.
You don’t owe us a penny unless we win your case.
Dan is a really nice guy, he’s very professional and good at his job. A friend recommended me to him and I can see why. Dan is really helpful and answered any and all questions I had and was very good at explaining the whole process to me. I feel confident…
Attorney Dan Petroskey provided excellent representation for my children. He was professional, compassionate and made my kids laugh. He made us feel comfortable every step of the way and answered all of my kids’ questions…
Don’t go anywhere else but to Them FIRST!!!!! So much to say about this Firm!!! Unbelievable, Outstanding, They are on your side when NO ONE else is (other firms). I have only heard good stories about them. Dan was fabulous to talk to on …
Our clients’ well being always comes first—we handle every detail so they can focus on recovery.
Free Comprehensive Consultation
What Is Underinsured Motorist Coverage in Connecticut?
Connecticut General Statutes Section 38a-336 requires automobile liability policies to include uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. UM coverage protects insured people who are legally entitled to damages from an uninsured motorist. UIM coverage applies when the total applicable bodily injury liability limits are lower than the applicable UM/UIM limit. Connecticut regulations extend UM/UIM coverage to occupants of vehicles covered by the policy’s bodily injury liability coverage.
A passenger may be insured under the host vehicle’s policy as an occupant, or under a household policy as a resident relative.
Uninsured Motorist (UM) Coverage
UM coverage may apply when an at-fault driver has no insurance, when coverage is denied, or when a hit-and-run driver cannot be identified. The passenger can make a claim through the applicable UM policy but must still establish the other driver’s fault and prove the resulting damages.
Underinsured Motorist (UIM) Coverage
UIM applies when the total applicable bodily injury liability limits are lower than the applicable UIM limit. Under standard UIM coverage, payments from applicable liability policies count toward the UIM limit, so UIM does not necessarily pay the full difference between the passenger’s damages and the liability recovery. Section 38a-336 also sets timing rules for suit or arbitration, including a three-year minimum contractual period and additional requirements for tolling a UIM claim.
However, if the insured purchased optional Conversion UIM coverage, payments by or on behalf of the at-fault driver do not reduce the conversion-coverage limit, subject to the passenger’s proven damages and the policy terms.
Key Takeaway: A passenger can seek UIM benefits when the total applicable bodily injury liability limits are lower than the applicable UIM limit. Which policy applies depends on Section 38a-336’s priority rules and the policy terms.
Car Accident Attorney in Waterbury - DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C.
Dan Petroskey, Esq.
Dan Petroskey was admitted to the Connecticut Bar in 2004 and is the owner of DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C., continuing the legacy of more than 60 years built by founding attorney Eugene L. DeFronzo. He joined the practice as Mr. DeFronzo’s associate and later became his first and only law partner. Dan earned his B.A. from Colby College and his J.D. from Albany Law School, serves as President of the Waterbury Bar Association, and has been recognized by Best Lawyers and as a Super Lawyers Rated attorney in personal injury law.
In catastrophic injury cases, Dan works with treating physicians, life care planners, and economists to document the full cost of an injury before negotiations begin, which matters in passenger claims involving multiple liability or UM/UIM coverage sources.
Which Insurance Policies Can Cover a Passenger's Injuries?
An injured passenger can have more than one source of payment. Applicable liability coverage comes first for a standard UIM claim because UIM benefits are payable after all applicable bodily injury liability limits are exhausted. Medical payments coverage can also apply if the policy includes it. Identifying all sources before settlement helps define the available coverage.
| Coverage Source | When It Applies | What a Passenger Should Know |
|---|---|---|
| At-fault driver liability coverage | Another driver or the host driver caused the crash | Connecticut minimum limits are $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for bodily injury |
| Second at-fault driver liability coverage | Two or more drivers share responsibility | Claims against each driver can proceed at the same time |
| Uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage | The responsible driver has no coverage or too little | May be available under the host vehicle's policy and under a resident relative's policy |
| Medical payments coverage | Medical bills are incurred regardless of fault | Pays treatment costs early, often while liability is still disputed |
Liability Coverage From the At-Fault Driver
Bodily injury liability coverage is the primary recovery source; Connecticut requires owners of private passenger motor vehicles to be registered in the state to maintain the security required by law under Connecticut General Statutes Section 38a-371. Passengers injured in an Uber or Lyft vehicle may reach larger limits, since Connecticut General Statutes Section 13b-120 requires at least $1 million in coverage while a transportation network company driver is transporting a rider.
Your Own Auto Insurance as a Passenger
Your own automobile policy can respond even though you were not driving, depending on its terms. If the policy includes medical payments coverage, it can pay covered medical expenses without regard to fault. Your uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage may also apply, subject to Connecticut’s priority and anti-stacking rules.
Defronzo Law Firm is a very helpful and attentive law office! I can personally recommend Attorney Petroskey, he is a great attorney and I am very confident in his representation of my interests. From my working with Atty Petroskey, I can …
I cannot recommend Dan Petroskey enough! After my accident, he was incredibly supportive and handled my case with care, expertise, and professionalism. Dan made the entire process so much easier during a very stressful time, ensuring I understood…
A family member needed legal counsel.DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. and Ivelisse Cruz we’re very helpful, explained the process in terms that were easy to understand ( not a lot of legal terms that are over our heads ) and the case moved along …
Learn More
Can a Passenger's Own Negligence Reduce Compensation?
A passenger’s own conduct can reduce compensation. Under Section 52-572h, Connecticut follows modified comparative negligence. Damages are reduced by the passenger’s percentage of negligence, and recovery is barred if the passenger’s negligence is greater than the combined negligence of the persons against whom recovery is sought. A passenger with no negligent conduct has no comparative negligence reduction.
Defendants can argue that a passenger’s conduct, such as grabbing the wheel or distracting the driver, contributed to the injury. Seat belt nonuse is different. Under Section 14-100a(c)(3), failure to wear a seat belt is not contributory negligence and is not admissible evidence in a civil action.
Driver and occupant statements, crash reports, and physical evidence often show the passenger played no role. Waterbury attorney Dan Petroskey evaluates these defenses and gathers proof. Call DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. at (203) 756-7408 for a free consultation.
What Damages Can an Injured Passenger Recover?
An injured passenger can recover both economic losses and noneconomic losses caused by the crash. The categories below are the ones most often at issue in Waterbury passenger claims.
- Medical expenses: Reasonable and necessary medical expenses caused by the crash, such as emergency care, imaging, surgery, physical therapy, and prescription costs, may be recoverable when supported by billing records and treatment records.
- Lost wages and earning capacity: Income lost during recovery is recoverable, and a passenger who cannot return to the same work may also claim reduced future earning capacity.
- Pain and suffering: Physical pain, discomfort, and the loss of the ability to enjoy normal activities are compensable, and the trier of fact assigns the value.
- Future care costs: Injuries requiring ongoing treatment, additional surgery, or long-term assistance support a claim for the projected cost of that care.
- Property damage: Personal property damaged in the crash, such as a phone, laptop, or car seat, may be included in the claim.
What Deadlines Apply to a Passenger Injury Claim in Connecticut?
Under Connecticut General Statutes Section 52-584, a negligence action must be brought within two years from the date the injury is first sustained or discovered, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been discovered, and no later than three years from the negligent act or omission, subject to any applicable exception or tolling rule.
Claims under uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage follow a separate timetable. Under Section 38a-336, a policy cannot set a suit or arbitration period shorter than three years from the accident, subject to the statute’s separate rule for certain uninsured motorist claims involving insurer insolvency or denial of coverage. For those UM claims, the policy cannot set a period shorter than one year from the insured’s receipt of written notice of the insolvency or denial. For a UIM claim, the statute permits tolling when written notice is given before the applicable period expires and suit or arbitration is commenced within 180 days after all applicable bodily injury liability limits are exhausted by settlement or final judgment after appeals.
Missing an applicable limitation period can bar the claim, subject to any tolling or saving rule that applies. A passenger claim often involves both a liability claim and a coverage claim, so the two schedules should be calendared separately.
Key Takeaway: Section 52-584 requires a negligence action within two years after the injury is first sustained or discovered, or reasonably should have been discovered, with a three-year outer limit from the negligent act or omission. UM/UIM claims follow separate contractual timing rules under Section 38a-336.
What Mistakes Can Hurt a Passenger's Injury Claim?
Several avoidable mistakes can weaken a passenger injury claim, especially during the early stages after a crash.
- Not identifying every liable driver: Pursuing only the host driver leaves a second liability policy untouched, which can cap the recovery well below the actual losses.
- Accepting an early settlement: An early offer can arrive before treatment is complete or all coverage layers are identified. A signed release can bar the claims it covers, although Connecticut law makes certain releases obtained within 15 days of the tortious act voidable if statutory conditions are met.
- Overlooking a resident relative policy: A passenger who lives with an insured relative may qualify for uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits under that relative’s policy even though the relative was not in the vehicle.
- Failing to identify other potentially applicable policies: Other household policies can still matter under Connecticut’s UM/UIM priority rules, but their vehicle limits cannot be added together to increase the UM/UIM limit for one accident.
- Delaying medical treatment: Gaps in treatment give insurers an argument that the injury was minor or unrelated to the crash.
Areas We Serve
DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. represents injured passengers throughout Waterbury, including the downtown business district, the East End, Bunker Hill, Town Plot, and the Brooklyn and Overlook neighborhoods. We also serve surrounding New Haven County communities such as Naugatuck, Middlebury, Wolcott, Prospect, Cheshire, Beacon Falls, Oxford, and Southbury, along with nearby Litchfield County towns including Watertown, Thomaston, Woodbury, and Bethlehem. Cases filed in the Waterbury Judicial District are heard at Waterbury Superior Court, a short distance from our Bank Street office.
Speak With a Waterbury Car Accident Attorney
The value of a passenger claim depends on how many policies apply, and that question is answered by investigation rather than by an adjuster’s first phone call. Every driver involved, every household vehicle, and every coverage layer should be identified before any offer is evaluated.
Dan Petroskey handles passenger injury claims from the first insurance contact through trial in Waterbury Superior Court, pursuing claims against each at-fault driver and, where necessary, against uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. He reviews the host vehicle’s policy, the other driver’s policy, and any policy covering you as a resident relative before recommending a settlement position.
Call DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. at (203) 756-7408 to schedule a free consultation, or reach us through our contact page. Our office at 255 Bank Street, Suite 2B, Waterbury serves families throughout New Haven County and Litchfield County.
Frequently Asked Questions About Passenger Injury Claims in Waterbury, CT
Can I sue the driver of the car I was riding in?
Yes, a passenger can bring a negligence claim against the driver of the host vehicle, including a spouse, parent, adult child, friend, or coworker. Connecticut General Statutes Section 52-572c removes the former immunity between parent and child in motor vehicle negligence actions. The claim is presented to that driver’s liability insurer.
What if I do not know which driver caused the accident?
A passenger does not have to decide who caused the crash before filing a claim. Claims can be asserted against every driver whose conduct may have contributed, and responsibility is apportioned later under Section 52-572h by the court or jury. Investigation continues while all claims remain open.
Does my own car insurance cover me if I was a passenger?
A personal auto policy can provide protection even when you occupy another person’s car. If the policy includes medical payments coverage, it can pay covered treatment costs without regard to fault. A passenger may also have access to their own uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage, subject to Connecticut’s priority and anti-stacking rules under Section 38a-336.
Will suing a family member affect their insurance rates?
It can affect the driver’s insurance rate, but an increase is not automatic or uniform. The Connecticut Insurance Department lists driving record and claims history as rating factors and notes that accidents can increase rates or result in the loss of a claims-free discount. The effect depends on the insurer’s rating plan and the circumstances of the claim.
How long do I have to file a passenger injury claim in Connecticut?
Section 52-584 gives two years from when the injury is first sustained or discovered, or reasonably should have been discovered, subject to a three-year outer limit from the negligent act or omission. UM/UIM claims have separate timing rules under Section 38a-336, including specific tolling provisions for UIM claims and a separate rule for certain UM claims involving insurer insolvency or denial of coverage.
How much does it cost to hire a passenger injury attorney in Waterbury?
Fees depend on the specifics of the case. DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. offers a free initial consultation, and fee terms are explained directly during that meeting so you know the arrangement before you decide to proceed.